Kate Maltby had a pop at Jacinda Ardern, Justin Trudeau and Luis da Silva in the Independent the other week. About the Brazilian president-elect, she wrote:
You may, like me, have seen your social media pages flood this week with declarations of joy at Lula’s ascent. Lefty friends of mine changed their profile pictures to warm-filtered images of the former trade-unionist, hands raised in victory. How many of them, I wondered, could provide a basic summary of the Bolsa Família programme, cornerstone of Lula’s economic platform when he last led the nation between 2003 and 2011.The Bolsa Família was one of the largest cash transfers from rich to poor in the world – but crucially, it was also conditional. Under Lula, poor families received unprecedented financial support, but only if their children were kept in school and the parents proved themselves functional members of society. Lula’s supporters still claim that the Bolsa Família programme had a transformative effect on truancy rates and workplace productivity.
But what did Bolsonaro or his conservative predecessors do for those children? And would Lula have been able to push his Familia programme through parliament without those checks?
No comments:
Post a Comment