Draft speech for Theresa May’s
successor
Thank
you for your support and the trust you have invested in me in these
difficult times.
I
should like first of all to pay tribute to my predecessor. Even her
worst enemies would acknowledge Theresa’s single-mindedness,
determination and loyalty to our party. It is not her fault that we
failed to reach a mutually satisfying withdrawal agreement with the
European Union. If Theresa could not achieve Brexit while keeping our
party together, nobody could. Rather, the inherent contradictions in
the Brexit process defeated us all.
We
must admit that there was only a narrow margin of victory in the 2016
referendum. If it had been part of a scientific experiment, the
result would have been set aside as not statistically significant.
Even within the ranks of the winning side in that referendum, there
were differing views on what sort of withdrawal was required.
Calling
a general election in 2017 was a justifiable attempt to strengthen
our majority in parliament and a consistent approach to our
negotiations with Brussels. As it turned out, the election only
confirmed what the referendum had already shown: the divisions within
our country.
If
an impasse is reached on a committee, a council or even in our
deliberations in the Mother of Parliaments, it is down to the chair,
the man or woman in charge, to make a casting vote. The convention is
that he or she opts for the status quo ante. This great party of ours is
the largest in parliament and all the indications are that it would
remain so if there were an election tomorrow. It is up to us to take
charge of the situation, to make a judgement to break the deadlock.
In our present situation, the status quo is to remain in the European
Union. Accordingly, as soon as I have kissed hands with Her Majesty,
I shall write to the President of the Council indicating our wish to
withdraw the application to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty.
We
must apologise for the promises made by our leadership at the time of
the referendum, along with their ludicrous prognostications of doom.
The
referendum is a concept which has not been part of our tradition of
parliamentary government and has never been regarded as binding in
England. We Conservatives must renounce the use of the referendum as
a foreign import, the tool of Napoleon and Hitler, and return to
traditional firm government. But we must not ignore the clear
messages which the electorate has sent us.
We
have been lax in stopping benefit tourism from Europe, and in
policing the breaches of the living wage legislation. Unscrupulous
businesses have taken advantage of ignorant immigrants from the rest
of the EU and of illegal immigrants from elsewhere to push down
wages. We will put a stop to all that. At the same time, we will rid
this country of the spivs and speculators who, abetted by the New
Labour government, nearly brought this country to its knees in 2008.
We
will redouble our efforts to improve the Common Agriculture Policy so
that working farmers have priority over those who merely own rural
land. We will also remove the red tape which has been so burdensome.
Farmers in Europe do not have to struggle with the paperwork and
unnecessary regulation which have resulted from the “gold-plating”
of EU directives, and we will strip all that away, While mindful of
the need to preserve fish stocks, we will seek to restore the rights
of our fishermen under the Common Fisheries Policy and rein back the
free-for-all in the North Sea.
In
1940 we re-engaged with Europe to defeat Nazism and Fascism, with
their repugnant credo of anti-Semitism. In 2019 we must do so again.
We have rightly put pressure on Her Majesty’s official opposition
to rid itself of the anti-Semites in its midst, but we cannot ignore
the growing anti-Semitism in the ruling parties on the Eastern
fringes of the European Union. We must add our weight to measures to
bring those nations back into the civilised world. We cannot let this
canker grow unchecked as we did in the 1930s.
So
with Brexit behind us and releasing the resources in money and civil
service manpower which the process has sucked up over the last three
years, we can concentrate on the path Mrs May laid out for us in her
inaugural Downing Street speech, taking the pressure off the “just
managing”, stamping out violent crime and drug misuse, and combating terrorism.
I
commend this statement to the party.
No comments:
Post a Comment